|
|
God interpreted through Holy Tradition and confirmed by the Councils of the
Church that guard the Church from heresy and error. This Tradition, says
Schaeffer, has only been authentically preserved in the Orthodox Church which
claims to trace its leaders (priests and bishops) to the first Apostles.
While I don't agree with all his conclusions, Schaeffer's cultural analysis of
modern Christendom is excellent, and he makes a good case for Protestant
theological participation in the causes of our state, especially our divisiveness and
our doctrinal, scriptural, and historical ignorance. The book is worth a read to
wake you up, and his criticisms need to be faced head on.
On the downside, Schaeffer's personal bitterness and hurt emerge in a
polemic that is as acerbic as anything Martin Luther or John Calvin ever wrote.
Midway through the book, the analysis of our errors, rather than being helpful,
degenerate almost into name calling. The book becomes harder to read not for
what is being said, but for the way in which it is said. Its tone represents an
angry man more than an orthodox faith.
Another flaw is Schaeffer's tendency to force all of Western history into one
particular interpretive model blaming all of the West's problems solely on
Protestantism. That focus is unjustly narrow to account for all the influences
affecting the West in its decline, even though Protestantism may be more
susceptible to the assault than Orthodoxy.
While surely the West can benefit from the corporate wisdom of Orthodoxy,
the argument of historical continuity is insufficient proof that the current
Orthodox Church has faithfully preserved the interpretation and practice of the
Scriptures. The Old Testament is replete with examples where the Levitical
priesthood compromised itself by its allegiance to the power structure of Israel.
Corrupt and idolatrous kings and priests had to be confronted by prophets who
bore the fresh Word of the Lord.
Levitical tradition and lineage were not guarantees of faithfulness then;
neither are they today. There are further examples in history, from Constantine
to Henry VIII, where alliances of church and king produced political and
economic benefits for the Church at the expense of faithfulness to the Word of
God. That Orthodoxy has been preserved from such influences to such a degree
that it has no need of prophetic challenge cannot be demonstrated either by
history or by current practice.
Schaeffer's book will undoubtedly rub the Protestant believer's fur the wrong
way, which is perhaps a merit in itself. His criticisms, however, are less remedial
than irksome, since he dismisses any possibility of reform. His condemnation of
Protestantism is utter and complete, leaving no alternative except caustic rebuke.
Rather than coaxing more Protestants to "return" to Orthodoxy, Frank may have
to continue to dance alone.
|
|